Reintroduces separate contexts for users, channels, connections (now split into sessions and connections) and user-channel associations. It builds which is as much assurance as I can give about the stability of this commit, but its also the bare minimum of what i like to commit sooooo A lot of things still need to be broadcast through events throughout the application in order to keep states consistent but we'll cross that bridge when we get to it. I really need to stop using that phrase thingy, I'm overusing it.
29 lines
1.2 KiB
C#
29 lines
1.2 KiB
C#
using SharpChat.SockChat.S2CPackets;
|
|
using SharpChat.Users;
|
|
|
|
namespace SharpChat.ClientCommands;
|
|
|
|
public class RankChannelClientCommand : ClientCommand {
|
|
public bool IsMatch(ClientCommandContext ctx) {
|
|
return ctx.NameEquals("rank")
|
|
|| ctx.NameEquals("privilege")
|
|
|| ctx.NameEquals("priv");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
public async Task Dispatch(ClientCommandContext ctx) {
|
|
long msgId = ctx.Chat.RandomSnowflake.Next();
|
|
|
|
if(!ctx.User.Permissions.HasFlag(UserPermissions.SetChannelMinimumRank) || ctx.Channel.IsOwner(ctx.User.UserId)) {
|
|
await ctx.Chat.SendTo(ctx.User, new CommandResponseS2CPacket(msgId, LCR.COMMAND_NOT_ALLOWED, true, $"/{ctx.Name}"));
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if(ctx.Args.Length < 1 || !int.TryParse(ctx.Args.First(), out int chanHierarchy) || chanHierarchy > ctx.User.Rank) {
|
|
await ctx.Chat.SendTo(ctx.User, new CommandResponseS2CPacket(msgId, LCR.INSUFFICIENT_HIERARCHY));
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
await ctx.Chat.UpdateChannel(ctx.Channel, rank: chanHierarchy);
|
|
await ctx.Chat.SendTo(ctx.User, new CommandResponseS2CPacket(msgId, LCR.CHANNEL_HIERARCHY_CHANGED, false));
|
|
}
|
|
}
|