Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/website/pulls/230
(cherry picked from commit 87d56bf6c7)
[CI] Forgejo Actions based release process (squash)
base64 -w0 to avoid wrapping when the doer name is long as it creates
a broken config.json
(cherry picked from commit 9efdc27e49)
[CI] Forgejo Actions based release process (squash) generate .xz files and sources
Generate .xz files
Check .sha256
Generate the source tarbal
(cherry picked from commit 7afec520c4)
[CI] Forgejo Actions based release process (squash) release notes
(cherry picked from commit d8f4f4807b)
[CI] Forgejo Actions based release process (squash) publish and sign release
(cherry picked from commit a52778c747)
(cherry picked from commit cf2ec62740)
[CI] Forgejo Actions based release process (squash) version
use Actions environment variables in Makefile (#25319) (#25318)
uses Actions variable to determine the version. But Forgejo builds
happen in a container where they are not available. Do not use them.
Also verify the version of the binary is as expected for sanity check.
(cherry picked from commit 6decf111a1)
(cherry picked from commit 206d0b3886)
[CI] read STORED_VERSION_FILE if available
(cherry picked from commit af74085ebf)
[CI] backward compatible executable compilation
Add a new static-executable target to use in Dockerfiles and restore
the $(EXECUTABLE) target to what it was before to for backward
compatibility.
The release process now builds static executables instead of
dynamically linked ones which makes them more portable. It changes the
requirements at compile time and is not backward compatible. In
particular it may break packaging that rely on the target that
currently creates a dynamically linked executable.
(cherry picked from commit 84d02a174a)
(cherry picked from commit 854be47328)
[CI] Forgejo Actions based release process (squash) doc / ca / verbosity
- Document workflow
- Increase verbosity if VERBOSE=true
- Download the Certificate Authority if behind the VPN
(cherry picked from commit 168d5d5869)
(cherry picked from commit f9d75d4705)
(cherry picked from commit 64f76f4ab2)
(cherry picked from commit 5d02454155)
[CI] Forgejo Actions workflows
(cherry picked from commit 3ff59b5379)
(cherry picked from commit 8af826a6f7)
(cherry picked from commit d7c09d9cc8)
[CI] use the docker label instead of ubuntu-latest
(cherry picked from commit b6a6470db6)
[CI] all tests need compliance before proceeding
(cherry picked from commit b35c496f2c)
(cherry picked from commit 36a4148a8e)
(cherry picked from commit 7ffcffa653)
(cherry picked from commit 8a246d296e)
(cherry picked from commit dd0b6e1826)
[CI] Forgejo Actions based release process (squash) MySQL optimization
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/976
(cherry picked from commit b4b8c489e6)
f92e0a4018 added minio to the tests/pgsql.ini.tmpl and Forgejo CI does
not run a minio server. It will if there are external storage related
changes at some point but it is not the case now so it is not worth
the burden.
(cherry picked from commit 4cfbf4718d)
(cherry picked from commit 9bd644d601)
(cherry picked from commit 604636c7c4)
(cherry picked from commit 341cdb8540)
(cherry picked from commit 57bdc91de5)
(cherry picked from commit c6ec6517b4)
(cherry picked from commit 2f03fc1b29)
(cherry picked from commit aaecd10966)
(cherry picked from commit 7025ff7b06)
(cherry picked from commit 15e6485ae1)
(cherry picked from commit 5f7b23c659)
(cherry picked from commit a74d7ce6c5)
(cherry picked from commit f552e2fc56)
(cherry picked from commit 9fa4a90baa)
(cherry picked from commit a8be33da60)
(cherry picked from commit 205f7897aa)
(cherry picked from commit c2a7aaeee8)
(cherry picked from commit 6b6007fbce)
(cherry picked from commit 63608a221e)
(cherry picked from commit 5cfe60baa7)
(cherry picked from commit 2af4c73d12)
(cherry picked from commit 1985959bfe)
(cherry picked from commit 880424c77e)
(cherry picked from commit c78a861d1b)
(cherry picked from commit 25c1227011)
(cherry picked from commit 7195e894ee)
(cherry picked from commit cf15153873)
(cherry picked from commit 9bee773c95)
(cherry picked from commit 581c3060da)
(cherry picked from commit bf550f9b2c)
(cherry picked from commit b570eca0b9)
[CI] implementation: Woodpecker based CI (squash)
Upgrade xgo to Go v1.20 for building binaries
(cherry picked from commit 6308c776b6)
[CI] v1.20: switch PR check from Woodpecker CI to Forgejo Actions
The PR checks for v1.19 still rely on Woodpecker CI. Keeping
.woodpecker in v1.20 while both Woodpecker CI & Forgejo Actions are
enabled would dupicate the checks.
The release process in releases remains Woodpecker CI.
(cherry picked from commit 93e42f3f53)
(cherry picked from commit 599c5162ad)
(cherry picked from commit 6f8b723a55)
(cherry picked from commit e238d7d72f)
(cherry picked from commit 2258fb575b)
Fix#25726#17846 chose an incorrect WORK_DIR path for docker root image.
Gitea's work-path was already used as the base path for various paths
(like AppDataPath), so, the work-path should be mounted to a volume in a
docker image.
Now, for docker root image, it's unavoidable to mix the
WorkPath/CustomPath/AppDataPath in the same directory ("/data/gitea"),
because some of them have already been mixed.
Some directories in the screenshot are for "CustomPath" , while others
are for "AppDataPath", due to the technical debts in old code:
```
CUSTOM_PATH="/data/gitea"
APP_DATA_PATH = /data/gitea
```
<details>
![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/9f0648ac-f731-4a08-9f26-1af01a1824b1)
</details>
This PR is breaking but this is the only way at the moment to avoid
users losing their data accidently
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Replace #25580Fix#19453
The problem was: when users set "GITEA__XXX__YYY" , the "install page"
doesn't respect it.
So, to make the result consistent and avoid surprising end users, now
the "install page" also writes the environment variables to the config
file.
And, to make things clear, there are enough messages on the UI to tell
users what will happen.
There are some necessary/related changes to `environment-to-ini.go`:
* The "--clear" flag is removed and it was incorrectly written there.
The "clear" operation should be done if INSTALL_LOCK=true
* The "--prefix" flag is removed because it's never used, never
documented and it only causes inconsistent behavior.
![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/12778ee4-3fb5-4664-a73a-41ebbd77cd5b)
Fix#25627
1. `ctx.Data["Link"]` should use relative URL but not AppURL
2. The `data-params` is incorrect because it doesn't contain "page". JS
can simply use "window.location.search" to construct the AJAX URL
3. The `data-xxx` and `id` in notification_subscriptions.tmpl were
copied&pasted, they don't have affect.
Fixes (?) #25538
Fixes https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/972
Regression #23879#23879 introduced a change which prevents read access to packages if a
user is not a member of an organization.
That PR also contained a change which disallows package access if the
team unit is configured with "no access" for packages. I don't think
this change makes sense (at the moment). It may be relevant for private
orgs. But for public or limited orgs that's useless because an
unauthorized user would have more access rights than the team member.
This PR restores the old behaviour "If a user has read access for an
owner, they can read packages".
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
To mock a handler:
```go
web.RouteMock(web.MockAfterMiddlewares, func(ctx *context.Context) {
// ...
})
defer web.RouteMockReset()
```
It helps:
* Test the middleware's behavior (assert the ctx.Data, etc)
* Mock the middleware's behavior (prepare some context data for handler)
* Mock the handler's response for some test cases, especially for some
integration tests and e2e tests.
related #16865
This PR adds an accessibility check before mounting container blobs.
---------
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Monaco can not deal with color formats other than 6-digit hex, so we
convert the colors for it via new
[`tinycolor2`](https://github.com/bgrins/TinyColor) dependency (5kB
minzipped).
Also, with the addition of the module, we can replace the existing
`hexToRGBColor` usage, I verified it is compatible with the current
tests before removing the function.
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/25770
This PR will display a pull request creation hint on the repository home
page when there are newly created branches with no pull request. Only
the recent 6 hours and 2 updated branches will be displayed.
Inspired by #14003
Replace #14003Resolves#311Resolves#13196Resolves#23743
co-authored by @kolaente
Follow #25229
At present, when the trigger event is `pull_request_target`, the `ref`
and `sha` of `ActionRun` are set according to the base branch of the
pull request. This makes it impossible for us to find the head branch of
the `ActionRun` directly. In this PR, the `ref` and `sha` will always be
set to the head branch and they will be changed to the base branch when
generating the task context.
Replace esbuild's rudimentary CSS minifier with [Lightning
CSS](https://github.com/parcel-bundler/lightningcss), which results in
around 4% smaller CSS bundle size, index.css goes from 608K to 584K.
The module is quite new but has active use in the Parcel bundler, and as
of yesterday is also under experimental support in Vite, so I trust it
that bugs will be sorted out quickly.
Before: `assets by path css/*.css 959 KiB`
After: `assets by path css/*.css 933 KiB`
I did give this a cursory test and everything seems to be in order.
A couple of notes:
* Future changes should refactor arguments into a struct
* This filtering only is supported by meilisearch right now
* Issue index number is bumped which will cause a re-index
Fix#25736
Caused by #24048
Right now we only check the activity type for `pull_request` event when
`types` is specified or there are no `types` and filter. If a workflow
only specifies filters but no `types` like this:
```
on:
pull_request:
branches: [main]
```
the workflow will be triggered even if the activity type is not one of
`[opened, reopened, sync]`. We need to check the activity type in this
case.
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Hi Gitea Team,
I would like to apply as a maintainer.
I don't have that much in-depth knowledge of the codebase, but I would
like to help to review PRs for the beginning in my free time and
contribute in frontend, backend tasks and new proposals.
Here is my PR list:-
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pulls?q=is%3Apr+author%3Apuni9869+is%3Amerged+